Disgusting defamation against me, Jabra, on KSF Discord

[Michael.Viera]

Edit 20. February: Simex did lie. He said he had only sent messages for Orison etc., but he continuously spammed Sam about it (I guess 3-5 times). So he didn't just send messages for them (maybe the first time). But afterward he sent messages by his own active will clearly. No, it isn't a big lie lol, but it is not the issue either.

I didn't say you spread it. I wrote "That was I guess you or Oliver". So now you are lying? Am I now to accuse you of lying and spamming this thread with tons of messages about you lying about me? I'm tired of these tactics. I want to talk about the real fucking issues, bullying, mocking autists etc. Yeah, I might skip shit sometimes, because I'm busy. And KSF still facilitated the spread of my list.
It is your business in some way. You are a member of KSF and have somewhat share in what KSF does. But no, I don't think you should deal with it. Rather top managers. So I will repeat it again. This time I'm being less tough in the end.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You haven't provided me any good examples of hate. I have for you now, the way I tackled my admin role back then But this hate was also initially encouraged by other KSF members by admin abusing people. I made many good points back then. I introduced the concept of following a procedure. The concept of legal basis. I introduced the concept of an admin that protects people from admin abuse. I wasn't just being abusive by any means. If some of these concepts were applied back then, we would never have stood in this situation. In fact, the two first concepts are so fundamental that it is impossible to not have admin abuse on KSF (since they are not applied). Instead, you have banned 5 letters and act like you are morally superior. It's a fucking joke.

So I can't really see how I spread hate. What I did to Simex was hate, yeah. Sam abused his power which he still hasn't provided any argument for. Abusing one's power is hate. And no, I'm not to provide evidence for that, then you don't understand the concept of burden of proof. But it was after I sent this "hate" that I was banned. I know that's the most racist thing you will ever read now.

It all started with I heard about whoknows_ksf settings were changed, consequentially, all former times were outdated on a pretty competitive map. I typed many messages about this issue on the Danish Discord. I requested my old good friend Syfo to look at this. He replied, "fuck you". No one really took it seriously on the Danish Discord, so as last resort I went on KSF Discord and complaint about this, especially KSF lacking procedures to change settings on maps once they have already been released.

One of the problems was that Simex who had WR interests in the map was the same guy who asked the top10 holders whether it would be fine to change the settings. This entails an obvious conflict of interest, group pressure, and so on. Top10 holders have to be able to approve/disapprove anonymously and the guy responsible for collecting their approvals/disapprovals should be impartial.

After that incident, I went insane. So that's again an example of KSF members initiating hate (which hit Simex). This is the conflict where you have totally excluded me from being heard which is utterly disgusting.
Also, I guess Simex or Oliver spreading my list that was confidential on KSF Discord. Once again spreading hate - you got that one back, sorry bro.
Sunday falsely reporting newcomers' records - ask Gmmbearz. I experienced it myself when I played under my alt account as "new player". That is hate.
Sam trashtalks my autism - that is hate. Ask Otter, he has also criticized this which I think was cool. When even your manager participates in hate speech, how do you think that sets the example for the "non-toxic culture of KSF"? It is basic organization theory that managers set the example for an organization's culture. I have been banned at KSF at numerous occasions for defending myself - that's hate. And no, don't say I don't have evidence, don't goddamn reverse the burden of proof - especially when you brought it up.
https://ksfclan.com/forum/showthread...1863#post21863 This is in 2019 less than 2 years ago where Masterbeta admin abuses, and then his victim acts in frustration and say something stupid, but it's only the victim's fault apparently, KSF members say nothing to Mastabeta who initiated the fight. You blatantly admin abused (or supported) a victim, apparent for everyone, for less than 2 years ago (just imagine all the shit that happens in the discrete) without the least fucking expression of empathy for the victim - and you guys are trying to convince me you changed? That's another one of your top managers being involved in abuse, Sacred. Again a good guy to set a great example for the non-toxic culture on KSF and who have shown a lot of remorse privately probably; maybe it is also about time to do so publicly? I remember mr.gmmbearz being frustrated over not being heard and as he started to take more and more records and he once complained about something and was actually taking serious he was like "FINALLY THEY WANNA HEAR SOMETHING". Is this really how it should be that first once you are good you ar being heard?

All this shit is recently so I still don't understand why you act like you have the moral high ground? You don't fucking. Get out.

I still haven't seen a reply to why KSF doesn't take libel seriously when they were warned about it BEFORE THIS THREAD? Isn't it hate to ban and exclude someone from the possibility for dissociating himself from sending threats? Regardless of whether those accuses were sent, your first mission as a professional organization should be to examine them after my inquiry. But you rather exclude that guy and silence him and bully him, seriously?

[Stevo_97]

What is your interpretation of spreading hate? You told multiple people to kill themselves. You have over the top reactions when anybody challenges you on a topic. I agree you have a lot of haters in the community, it's undeniable. If I could, I'd stop it, but you've built up a notorious reputation within the community because of your behaviour throughout the years. Even before this defamation incident, you'd pop up every few months and only further fuel the fire. If you can't understand why what you've said and done has garnered so much negativity towards you in the community, then I don't know what else to say to you.

[Michael.Viera]

Sure. Bye and thanks for the evidence, and I'm sorry for my evidence.

[Michael.Viera]

Also you lied. "Multiple people". Multiple means: "having or involving several parts, elements, or members. ". I told two people.
I hope we can stop it here. I think I have said enough.

[Stevo_97]

I didn't lie. Multiple is defined differently in different places, but the majority of English speakers know it to mean 'more than one'. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/multiple

[Michael.Viera]

Oxford Dictionary has higher authority https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionari...e_1?q=multiple
Bye. And if we should make a descriptive analysis of it's usage, I don't think you could find a lot of support, lmfao.

[Simex]

I didnt lie lol, you did. I told you it could not be me, and you resend the message as it could either be me or oliver, when you know it couldnt be me, thats a lie.
This fucking guy....

[Michael.Viera]

I wrote: I guess. Also. Bye.

[Juxtapo]

Oxford Dictionary has higher authority https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionari...e_1?q=multiple
Bye. And if we should make a descriptive analysis of it's usage, I don't think you could find a lot of support, lmfao.

Why does Oxford hold higher authority? Merriam Webster's first edition was released in 1828. Oxford University Press didn't release the L to N volume of their dictionary until eighty years later in 1908!

[Michael.Viera]

Even translates it into "many" on Google Translate ("mange" på dansk). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_English_Corpus I think it is based on this corpus, and just look at the context. Am I going to look through this corpus for you and show how the word isn't used like that in thousand of examples perhaps? I don't know if I bother to do that too. Just bye. I think enough has been said.